Dorene is a certified teacher in Idaho, but the only job she can find is as a teaching assistant, which pays under an hour. That is considerably less than the ,000 that the average teacher in Idaho earns annually. She asked that her full name not be used because her family doesn’t know she has been getting food stamp benefits for her two young children and herself for a year. “We live paycheck to paycheck,” she says, even with child support. “I never thought I’d be in this situation.”
Nationwide, one in seven Americans currently receives help from the government to put food on the table. All but 14 states saw double-digit spikes in the number of people getting food stamps over the one-year period that ended in November 2010. But Idaho had the largest one-year increase in the country: 28 percent, according to the latest government figures
Idaho even edged ahead of Nevada, which has the country’s highest unemployment rate at 14.5 percent. Idaho’s 9.5 percent rate is closer to the national average of 9 percent
. But Idaho’s unemployment rate is three times higher
than it was in 2007. “P
eople are simply running out of options,” says Adrienne Evans, executive director of United Vision for Idaho , an advocacy group in Boise
The record surge in Idaho is due to more than just the recession itself. Idaho has a history of being a somewhat welfare-resistant state. Before the recession began, only half the residents who were eligible actually came in and applied for food stamps. That number climbed to 55 percent in 2008, but it is still below the national average of more than 65 percent
“When the recession hit, people who had been able to get by on their own could no longer be self-sufficient,” says Tom Shanahan, a spokesman for the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare
. “They needed help and they came in to apply, and continue to do so.”
What is happening in Idaho is a stark reminder of the impact the weak economy is having on newly poor Americans and on cash-strapped states trying to help them. The federal stimulus package provided .5 billion for food stamps,
temporarily boosting monthly benefits until Nov. 1, 2013. Starting in April 2009, most four-person households received an increase in their monthly food stamp allotment .
Nationwide, the food stamp program helped 43.6 million people in November 2010 –
the latest data available. About half of those recipients are children. Before the recession, the program was serving 26 million (see graphic). The federal government pays the full cost of food stamp benefits, but splits the cost of administering the program with the states, which operate it. Technically, the program isn’t called “food stamps” anymore – it was
renamed as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP
, in 2008. N or does the
government actually give out paper stamps; Dorene and others receive their benefits on debit cards that can only be used to purchase food.
|Top 10 states
| Source: USDA, Jan. 31, 2011
Kathy D. Gardner, director of the Idaho Hunger Relief Task Force
, says the increase in the number of citizens getting food stamps is even more noteworthy because the state does not have any kind of outreach program to ensure that people who are eligible know they can sign up. The federal government has given bonus money
to states that increased SNAP participation, including Maine, Oregon and Tennessee, but Idaho is not one of them. And while Idaho’s state welfare website has an application form that can be downloaded, it does not allow individuals to complete and submit it online, something that at least 22 other states offer
Higher caseloads, fewer caseworkers
At the same time that more Idahoans are coming to the welfare offices for help, the state has fewer case workers to handle the job. The health and welfare department had to lay off more than 100 of its 3,100 employees and didn’t fill about 200 vacant positions because it didn’t have the funding to pay the wages.
Because of budget cuts, the state last June closed nine of the department’s 29 health and welfare offices, which in addition to food stamps also provide Medicaid coverage and services for child welfare, mental health and substance abuse and help for the developmentally disabled.
That meant food stamp workers in Idaho saw their average caseloads skyrocket to 627, up from 185 cases in 2008. “We are at the tipping point,” says Shanahan.
Despite the budget cutbacks, welfare officials and advocates for the poor say that Idahoans have largely been spared the long delays seen in some other states. The state upgraded and streamlined the way it determines its eligibility procedures in 2009. When someone walks in the door to apply, the state tries to give an answer and complete the paperwork in one day.
That differs from several other states. In Texas, for example, about one-third of food stamp applicants waited more than the 30-day limit the federal government imposes, according to an analysis
last year from The Associated Press
. Delays also were reported in Florida, Colorado, Nevada and Rhode Island.
Demand will continue
The demand for food stamps is expected to remain high throughout the country as the unemployment rate hovers near 9 percent in 2011, gradually falling to 8.2 percent by late 2012 and reaching the “natural rate” of 5.3 percent only in 2016, according to the Congressional Budget Office
Supporters say the program not only puts food on the table, but helps stimulate the economy. Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics
, figures that boosting food stamp payments by increases the Gross Domestic Product by .73. The USDA says the benefits are even higher, contending that every in new SNAP benefits generates as much as in economic activity.
But not everyone agrees. Before last fall’s elections, former U.S. House Speaker Newt Gingrich and then-Speaker Nancy Pelosi got into a war of words about the effect of food stamps on the economy. Gingrich disputed the impact of the program. “Somehow, I don’t understand how liberal math turns into .79,” he told Fox News
Tad DeHaven, a budget analyst at the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank, argues that the cost of food stamps has exploded and that the programs are highly susceptible to fraud
. He says they should be cut
, not expanded. “In fact,” he says, “the entire federal welfare system needs to be devolved to the states, or preferably, private charity.”
With Congress and the Obama administration promising to get federal spending in check, all programs, including food stamps, are expected to get closer scrutiny. By then, folks like Dorene hope to have better paying jobs and be off the rolls.